I was having general issues with latex compiling because of what I assume are the notes. You're exactly right that one big issue was in the JSTOR translator. basically every field that won't ever be in a citation. So for me then, I would much rather have (maybe a second) bibtex option in the output list that's just "BibTex (Simplified)" or something that basically does what I did above here. If I want to add a citation, I do it in zotero and re-export.
Personally, I always use zotero as the manager, and just export the bibtex file purely for writing a paper. if you're having the kinds of issues I did, it's a simple and easy workaround.Īs a more general note, I think it's pretty rare that I would ever want my notes (or even the abstracts for that matter) coming out in the bibtex file. Note the comments on the last "if" block - this removes the notes of course, and up above I commented out the if block for the extra field. WriteField("keywords", tagString.substr(1)) need to use non-localized abbreviation The extra field is not inherently problematic, but I've had trouble with it because the JSTOR translator puts the abstract in the extra field.Īnyway. I noticed that the end of the file included the ability to export the notes as well as the "extra" field as a note. I took a look at the bibtex.js file in zotero's translators folder. and in other cases, the bibliography produced in latex included things like the abstracts of articles. I was having issues with documents that wouldn't compile due to unidentified control sequences. But I've found that if you use notes for much of anything, this causes a problem. Basically, the export translator exports the notes and things as "comment" lines in the bibtex file. I've noticed it in particular since the use of html notes in 1.5. I've been having trouble lately with the BibTex export.
0 kommentar(er)
